City Council recently approved the over hiring of police officers, allowing SCPD to increase staffing from 94 sworn budgeted positions to 102 officers. One hundred two positions allow SCPD to keep new hires in the pipeline as we project senior officer’s retirements. Over hires will enable SCPD to prevent an 18-month gap between when one retires, and the new officer is in service.
According to academics and police leaders around the nation (PERF), policing faces a triple threat to adequate staffing. Fewer people apply for police jobs, more officers are leaving their departments and the profession, and a growing number of current employees are ready for retirement.
Over the years, SCPD has not done well in projecting the retirement of its officers. We are correcting that by calculating when a person is eligible to retire and when they are maxed out in the retirement system to give us a window of when they may retire. We also ask officers when they may retire, but the decision is a fluid date based on when opportunities arise.
As the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) noted in a recent publication, Workforce Crisis, “More officers are leaving their departments-and, in many cases, leaving the profession well before they retire.” In California, many are just taking partial retirement as soon as they can. After losing 10 to retirement in the past 18 months, we expect to lose at least six (6) more sworn personnel in the upcoming 24 months.
Police agencies across the nation report the number of applicants is down significantly. Sixty-three (63%) percent of departments say they experienced a reduction in applicants. SCPD screens about 1,200 applicants. We hired 36 and 26 made it through training. The training failure rate is about 30%. The training failure rate is a point of serious concern for our program, and we are examining ways to coach in rather than cut from our team.
SCPD by the numbers (July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019)
- 43 employees departed SCPD (sworn, professional staff, CSO’s and Rangers)
- 28 sworn officers left the department (of those)
- 10 officers retired
- 4 officers left law enforcement
- 4 cops lateraled to other law enforcement agencies (non-local)
- 9 trainees quit or were released from probation.
- 1 person was terminated
Additionally, at one point, there were 18 officers injured. Five (5) had been long term injuries that lingered in workman’s compensation for years, due to no fault of their own. They have since been retired, and the positions freed up to fill with new officers.
SCPD still has a little way to go before we are 100% healthy, staffed, and in the field; however, due to the hard work of Sergeant Wes Morey, HR, and DC Flippo, we well are close. Currently, we have two people off of work, 16 in various stages of training, and three (3) openings.
So, if you know of a smart and capable woman or man who wants a front seat to the best show on earth, a place where life speeds past in vivid color, a job where life is a thrill, and you have the independence to make important life-altering decisions each day, then recommend policing to them. It is one of the few places you can look back at your life and know the positive impact you had on an incredible community. They can contact me directly at: email@example.com
2 thoughts on “Staffing At SCPD”
Good morning Chief! Hope you are enjoying an extra hour of sleep and this beautiful fall weather! Regarding this post, it might be nice to include a photo with more diversity. Women and people of color might not be encouraged to respond to this recruitment request. Also there is a typo in the third paragraph: “…when a person is edible” should be eligible. Have a great day! Jenni Gomez (Leo’s wife)
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019, 8:32 AM Andrew Mills – Chief of Police – Santa Cruz wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org posted: ” City Council recently approved the > over hiring of police officers, allowing SCPD to increase staffing from 94 > sworn budgeted positions to 102 officers. One hundred two positions allow > SCPD to keep new hires in the pipeline as we project senior officer’s” >
Thanks Jennifer. I agree.